<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.5.4 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:47:34 GMT--><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/universal/styles/feed.css"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Current Intelligence - Comments</title><link>http://www.terraplexic.org/current-intelligence/</link><description></description><copyright></copyright><language>en-GB</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.5.4 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Marisa Urgo comments on 9/11 Most Iconic TV Moment Ever</title><author>Marisa Urgo</author><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:49:34 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.terraplexic.org/current-intelligence/2009/7/13/911-most-iconic-tv-moment-ever.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">185314:3924594:comment/4805266</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I guess we can just claim this as another example of the diminution of the language.  Soon it's just going to be known as the &quot;Extra Big A**&quot; Bad Day in History.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Tim Stevens comments on 9/11 Most Iconic TV Moment Ever</title><author>Tim Stevens</author><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:10:49 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.terraplexic.org/current-intelligence/2009/7/13/911-most-iconic-tv-moment-ever.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">185314:3924594:comment/4803174</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Curious phraseology, I agree. I thought the whole point of 9/11 was that it was 'iconoclastic'. Perhaps it speaks to the totemic status that 9/11 has become in US foreign policy? Interestingly, my ever-to-hand Chambers dictionary defines one use of 'icon' as 'anybody or anything venerated or uncritically admired'. Another definition would be 'a symbol, image, picture or representation'. That would be more like it but, again, of what is 9/11 iconic?</p>]]></description></item><item><title>John Matthew Barlow comments on 9/11 Most Iconic TV Moment Ever</title><author>John Matthew Barlow</author><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:27:24 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.terraplexic.org/current-intelligence/2009/7/13/911-most-iconic-tv-moment-ever.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">185314:3924594:comment/4803026</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>&amp; what, exactly, does &quot;iconic&quot; mean in this context?</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Marisa Urgo comments on 9/11 Most Iconic TV Moment Ever</title><author>Marisa Urgo</author><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:10:08 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.terraplexic.org/current-intelligence/2009/7/13/911-most-iconic-tv-moment-ever.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">185314:3924594:comment/4802758</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Iconic of <i>what</i> exactly?  Chaos and carnage?  Memorable, yes, but iconic?</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Tim Stevens comments on After Zero Tropes</title><author>Tim Stevens</author><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:31:45 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.terraplexic.org/current-intelligence/2009/7/8/after-zero-tropes.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">185314:3924594:comment/4802382</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>William Gibson's new book will be called <a href="https://p10.secure.hostingprod.com/@spyblog.org.uk/ssl/zerohistory/2009/05/william_gibsons_new_novel_in_p.html" rel="nofollow">Zero History</a>, apparently.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Christian Bleuer comments on Commander Of The Fearful</title><author>Christian Bleuer</author><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 15:51:46 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.terraplexic.org/current-intelligence/2009/7/11/commander-of-the-fearful.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">185314:3924594:comment/4795742</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I share the skepticism. The murder of 300, or even 3000, &quot;tribal elders&quot; will not destroy the patterns of loyalty. It will have an effect, obviously. But from what I've seen in the history of Central Asia, mass murder actually does not destroy &quot;tribal&quot; (or qawm) authority patterns. It takes massive economic incentives and changes in subsistence patterns (i.e., &quot;modernization&quot; or sedentarization or migration to urban areas) to do this. Even then, in some cases they have survived by, for example, moving solidarity groups en masse into a single neighbourhood or area. Even Soviet state structures were colonized by tribal/qawm groups.</p><p>I really doubt that Mehsud has &quot;dismantled the centuries-old tribal structures.&quot; Just because locals aren't mobilizing against him does not mean that they no longer have local authority structures in place. </p><p>In AF, Abdur Rahman tallied a body count of local leaders in the 10s of thousands. But local patterns of loyalty and authority just pushed 2nd tier guys into those positions. A hundred years later, continuous war and outside funding has allowed for some new authority patterns to emerge. But this took at least a decade of devastating conflict and massive in-flows of money and arms to the leaders of the jihadi parties (only two of whom tried to operate outside local authority patterns). And some of the changes seen are in fact not changes from the Soviet-Afghan and civil war eras, but effects of the &quot;intrusion&quot; of a modern market economy.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Tim Stevens comments on Best International Relations Book of the Decade</title><author>Tim Stevens</author><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:58:27 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.terraplexic.org/current-intelligence/2009/7/3/best-international-relations-book-of-the-decade.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">185314:3924594:comment/4765845</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Dan Nexon <a href="http://duckofminerva.blogspot.com/2009/07/isa-book-of-decade.html" rel="nofollow">offers his choices</a> at the Duck.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Mike Innes comments on More Anonymous COINdinistas</title><author>Mike Innes</author><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:59:50 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.terraplexic.org/current-intelligence/2009/7/9/more-anonymous-coindinistas.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">185314:3924594:comment/4764655</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Gulliver, Lil, no need to explain. It's a minor peeve, esp. compared to the echo chamber issue. Looking forward to reading your output.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>John Matthew Barlow comments on Out of Western China</title><author>John Matthew Barlow</author><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:53:43 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.terraplexic.org/current-intelligence/2009/7/9/out-of-western-china.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">185314:3924594:comment/4763304</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I think this hits the nail on the head, Marisa.  What I have read of Xijiang echoes this, it is overly simplistic to represent Uighurs as &quot;Muslim&quot; and not as members of the Chinese nation.  But at the same time, what I've read also suggests that part of what goes on from Beijing is an attempt to &quot;Other&quot; the Buddhists in Tibet and the Muslims in Xinjiang, as evidenced by re-settlement and official encouragement by Beijing for ethnic Han to move to these locations.  But Wang does point out that these are not always binary categories.</p>]]></description></item><item><title>Tim Stevens comments on More Anonymous COINdinistas</title><author>Tim Stevens</author><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:41:20 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.terraplexic.org/current-intelligence/2009/7/9/more-anonymous-coindinistas.html#comments</link><guid isPermaLink="false">185314:3924594:comment/4758088</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Curious that you have to dig pretty deep now to uncover Abu Muqawama IDs, since its move to the CNAS platform. I appreciate it was the worst-kept secret about AM's identity but why conceal it again?</p><p>Btw welcome, Gulliver, Lil and colleagues! Both to CTlab and the blogosphere.</p>]]></description></item></channel></rss>