Our Elusive Radicals
Politics & Society | âAuthor:
Marisa Urgo
Jan 12, 2010 at 1:38

John Matthew Barlow reviews John Lorinc's new book, Cities: A Groundwork Guide. Last year marked the first time that the majority of the world's population lived in cities; Lorinc's introduction to the subject offers a timely, and lively, critique of the issues confronting cities and humanity as a whole as we confront this radical restructuring of our way of living in the urban century.
John Matthew Barlow reviews John Lorinc's new book, Cities: A Groundwork Guide. Last year marked the first time that the majority of the world's population lived in cities; Lorinc's introduction to the subject offers a timely, and lively, critique of the issues confronting cities and humanity as a whole as we confront this radical restructuring of our way of living in the urban century.
Eric Randolph reviews Kathryn Bigelow's The Hurt Locker, and notes a shift in film-making sensibilities from the war-as-heroics paradigm of earlier Hollywood, towards the everyman's war-as-hell model that has now lodged itself in Western cultural consciousness.
Berlin-based writer Daniel Miller's October 2008 interview with Swedish philosopher and SITE Magazine Editor-In-Chief Sven-Olov Wallenstein, on his new book Biopolitics and the Emergence of Modern Architecture (Princeton Architectural Press, 2009).
The second symposium in CTlab's 2009 series, focused on Peter Singer's new book, Wired For War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century (Penguin Press: 2009), ran from 30 March to 2 April. Singer and half a dozen scholars from the U.S., Canada, the U.K., and Austria debated the use and ethics of robots in war.
Tim Stevens reports back from the DEFCON 17 conference in Las Vegas: are hackers thinking meat isn't just meat anymore?
Reader Comments (3)
proximity to the foreign policy-making elite? (am brainstorming here - no empirical basis for these comments)
this could work in a few ways hypothetically... i'm thinking, do people who live in and around the beltway have a greater consciousness of the political life of our nation and especially its foreign policy? is it possible that whether they do or not they are perceived to do so and to be best networked in that geographic space relative to others who live farther away and are they therefore more likely to be targets of extremist recruiters hoping to exploit those networks and that proximity? or could it be cognitive dissonance? perhaps the juxtaposition of a snail's eye view of US hegemonic practices and embeddedness in a diaspora affected negatively by those practices or in a many-shaded transnational religious identity catalyzes action when combined with other permissive factors in heightened ways...
I've linked to you here: http://skepticalbureaucrat.blogspot.com/2010/01/undefined.html
I drive past that particular ethnic strip mall - and many others - on my daily commute, and have often thought along these lines.
Hi, Charli,
I tried to post this the other day, but tech difficulties prevented it:
Good question, Charli, and a good Idea that has me thinking. Proximity to DC's vortex of strategy, policy and personalities could create a greater sensitivity to foreign policy and produce to some extent a generation of young men and women who are clued in and seeking a context. However, I also suspect that ethnic middle class suburban life could also influence the choices these young men and women make. In this context radical Islam could be interpreted as just one type of radical life among many available choices to an educated and networked working- to middle-class generation.
Radical recruiters could just be going to where the Muslims are. Northern VA has a large Muslim population. It's the perfect place to find young men willing to die for a cause greater than themselves. There is also a lot money here, and is a perfect place for fund raising for those "widows and orphans" overseas.
This topic fascinates me because Northern Virginia's characteristics -- suburban, not urban, ethnically integrated, relatively wealthy, educated -- challenges continued conventional wisdom about the motivating factors for radicalization. Oddly, I think it's a conventional wisdom based on European diaspora models where radicalization tends to occur in poor, poorly-integrated communities. I can't say much about, say, Detroit or Boston, but I don't see that model in effect here in NoVa.
There are datasets -- like Sageman's -- that challenge conventional wisdom, but they focus on individuals. There's nothing I've seen that looks at total environments. I hope that a some ambitious sociologists or anthropologist begins to seek answers in this very complex environment.